Contract award
GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC.
200208!001699!2100!SG60 !USA SPACE AND STRATEGIC DEF CDR !DASG6002D0010 !A!N! !Y!0006 !20020423!20050423!043991108!043991108!009581091!N!COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION !3160 FAIRVIEW PARK DRIVE !FALLS CHURCH !VA!22042!37000!089!01!HUNTSVILLE !MADISON !ALABAMA !+000000166000!N!N!000000000000!AC23!RDTE/MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS-ADV TECH DEV !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !1CAA!BALLISTIC MISSILE DEFENSE SYS !541710!E! !5!B!M! !A! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!Y!2!007!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! !Y! ! !0001!
- PIID
- 0006
- Award key
- CONT_AWD_0006_9700_DASG6002D0010_9700
- Recipient UEI
- Z2L7LVNEAPC3
- Parent award
- CONT_IDV_DASG6002D0010_9700
- Source as of
- —
Current award value
$03
Obligated to date
$3,985,9772
Potential with options
$03
- Awarding agency
- Department of DefenseDepartment of the Army
- Place of performance
- Huntsville, Alabama
- Set-aside
- No set-aside used
- Pricing
- Time and Materials
- Competition
- Full and Open Competition7 offers received
- Period of performance
- Apr 23, 2002 — Sep 30, 2008Through Sep 30, 2008 if all options are exercised
- Benchmark category
- Unclassified
Transaction history
Every action recorded against this award, in the order the government reported them.
| Mod | Action date | Reason | Obligation | Value at action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Apr 23, 2002 | Initial award | $166,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 1 | Jun 12, 2002 | C | $90,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 3 | Aug 23, 2002 | D | $70,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 4 | Sep 6, 2002 | C | $90,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 5 | Nov 1, 2002 | C | $100,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 6 | Jan 27, 2003 | C | $250,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 7 | Feb 25, 2003 | C | $40,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 8 | Nov 12, 2003 | C | $10,175.00 | $0.00 |
| 9 | Jan 27, 2004 | B | $710,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 10 | Feb 11, 2004 | C | $6,133.00 | $0.00 |
| 11 | Sep 27, 2004 | C | $34,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 12 | Oct 28, 2004 | C | $613,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 13 | Mar 15, 2005 | C | $437,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 14 | Mar 1, 2006 | B | $400,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 15 | Sep 7, 2006 | C | $3,195.00 | $0.00 |
| 16 | Dec 14, 2006 | M | $406,359.00 | $0.00 |
| 17 | Feb 6, 2007 | M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 18 | Feb 22, 2007 | M | $25,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 19 | Aug 8, 2007 | C | $95,450.00 | $0.00 |
| 20 | Sep 6, 2007 | C | $35,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 21 | Oct 17, 2007 | M | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 22 | Nov 5, 2007 | C | $300,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 23 | Dec 5, 2007 | C | $190,000.00 | $0.00 |
| 24 | Aug 18, 2008 | C | -$83,218.00 | $0.00 |
| 25 | Sep 29, 2011 | C | -$1,089.58 | $0.00 |
| 26 | Jun 19, 2013 | C | -$1,027.67 | $0.00 |
Provenance
Which source record produced each displayed rollup figure.
| Field | Source | File | Retrieved | Parser | Artifact hash |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| awarding_agency_id | USAspending.gov | — | Aug 30, 2026 | usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2 | 0b244d23f97d |
| contractor_id | USAspending.gov | — | Aug 30, 2026 | usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2 | 0b244d23f97d |
| current_award_value | USAspending.gov | — | Aug 30, 2026 | usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2 | 0b244d23f97d |
| naics_code | USAspending.gov | — | Aug 30, 2026 | usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2 | 0b244d23f97d |
| potential_award_value | USAspending.gov | — | Aug 30, 2026 | usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2 | 0b244d23f97d |
| psc_code | USAspending.gov | — | Aug 30, 2026 | usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2 | 0b244d23f97d |
| total_obligated | USAspending.gov | — | Aug 30, 2026 | usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2 | 0b244d23f97d |
Sources and method
Figures on this page are computed from public federal award records. Numbers are never estimated or generated; where a figure is withheld, the reason is stated rather than filled in.
This page is a record of one federal award, assembled from the transactions the government published against it. Note 1 describes where the rollup came from. Values are award values, not unit prices.
- 1Rollup values derive from 26 transaction records parsed from USAspending.gov, retrieved Aug 30, 2026 by transform awards@2026.08.1.
- 2Obligations are the sum of signed federal action obligations across all transactions; deobligations are negative and remain negative.
- 3Current and potential award values are taken from the latest reported action, not summed across modifications.