Skip to content
BidBenchmark

Contract award

ARCTIC SLOPE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.

IGF::OT::IGF THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT WILL BE TO PROVIDE SPACECRAFT AND GROUND SYSTEM SUSTAINING ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATIONAL SATELLITES OPERATED BY NESDIS UNDER OSPO, SUSTAINING ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR U.S. INSTRUMENTS ON THE METOP SATELLITES, OPERATIONAL AND GROUND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR JASON-2, ENGINEERING CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT OF MISSION OPERATIONAL DATABASES AND PRODUCTS FOR ALL CONSTELLATIONS, AND SUPPORT FOR FUTURE OSPO OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL SATELLITE PROGRAMS TO INCLUDE JASON-3, GOES-R/S/U AND JPSS-1.
PIID
DOCAB133E16CN0064
Award key
CONT_AWD_DOCAB133E16CN0064_1330_-NONE-_-NONE-
Recipient UEI
SGK5EGB9VQM8
Source as of
—
Current award value
$47,084,1753
Obligated to date
$45,859,0712
Potential with options
$47,084,1753
Awarding agency
Department of CommerceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Place of performance
Suitland, Maryland
Set-aside
Small Business Set-Aside - Total
Pricing
Cost Plus Fixed Fee
Competition
Full and Open Competition after Exclusion of Sources2 offers received
Period of performance
Jun 29, 2016 — Jun 28, 2021Through Jun 28, 2021 if all options are exercised
Benchmark category
Engineering Services

Against comparable awards

Where this award sits in the published Engineering Services distribution.

At $47,084,175, this award is above the top quartile. The median is $728,823 across 12,959 comparable awards.

Comparison uses the same measure (current award value) and the snapshot published Oct 22, 2026. See the full benchmark.

Transaction history

Every action recorded against this award, in the order the government reported them.

ModAction dateReasonObligationValue at action
0Jun 24, 2016Initial award$4,797,213.14$47,084,175.30
M0001Sep 16, 2016C$2,886,201.12$47,084,175.30
M0002Feb 4, 2017B$0.00$47,084,175.30
M0003Feb 22, 2017C$50,000.00$47,084,175.30
M0004Jun 27, 2017G$7,474,112.55$47,084,175.30
M0005Jun 28, 2017C$497,793.45$47,084,175.30
M0006Oct 31, 2017C$149,946.00$47,084,175.30
M0007Jan 22, 2018C$609,560.00$47,084,175.30
M0008Mar 27, 2018C$346,900.00$47,084,175.30
P18009May 1, 2018C$215,635.32$47,084,175.30
P18010Jun 28, 2018G$8,525,780.00$47,084,175.30
P18011Jul 27, 2018B$703,229.25$47,084,175.30
P18012Sep 20, 2018C-$135,565.27$47,084,175.30
P19013Jun 28, 2019G$9,116,931.59$47,084,175.30
P19014Aug 20, 2019B$1,086,220.34$47,084,175.30
P20015Apr 1, 2020B$33,000.06$47,084,175.30
P20016May 26, 2020C-$220,000.00$47,084,175.30
P20017Jun 23, 2020G$10,385,908.87$47,084,175.30
P20018Aug 5, 2020C$10,593.14$47,084,175.30
P23019Nov 21, 2022C-$83,047.76$47,084,175.30
P24020Jun 24, 2024C-$17,214.82$47,084,175.30
P26021Aug 28, 2026C-$574,126.05$47,084,175.30

Provenance

Which source record produced each displayed rollup figure.

FieldSourceFileRetrievedParserArtifact hash
awarding_agency_idUSAspending.gov—Aug 30, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.25d798c30e233
contractor_idUSAspending.gov—Aug 30, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.25d798c30e233
current_award_valueUSAspending.gov—Aug 30, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.25d798c30e233
naics_codeUSAspending.gov—Aug 30, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.25d798c30e233
potential_award_valueUSAspending.gov—Aug 30, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.25d798c30e233
psc_codeUSAspending.gov—Aug 30, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.25d798c30e233
total_obligatedUSAspending.gov—Aug 30, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.25d798c30e233

Sources and method

Figures on this page are computed from public federal award records. Numbers are never estimated or generated; where a figure is withheld, the reason is stated rather than filled in.

This page is a record of one federal award, assembled from the transactions the government published against it. Note 1 describes where the rollup came from. Values are award values, not unit prices.

  1. 1Rollup values derive from 22 transaction records parsed from USAspending.gov, retrieved Aug 30, 2026 by transform awards@2026.08.1.
  2. 2Obligations are the sum of signed federal action obligations across all transactions; deobligations are negative and remain negative.
  3. 3Current and potential award values are taken from the latest reported action, not summed across modifications.