Dishwasher Replacement B9436

W911SG26QA060 The Mission and Installation Contracting Command (MICC) � Fort Bliss, Texas issueD a Request for Proposal (RFQ) to award a single firm-fixed-price contract to provide all plant, labor, transportation, materials, tools, equipment, appliances, and supervision necessary for the replacement of Dishwasher and construction needed when dong so on B9436 at McGregor Range, NM. The contract duration is 180 days after notice to proceed. This project is 100% Small Business Set-Aside . The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 238210, with a size standard of $19,000,000.00. The magnitude of construction is between $100,000 and $250,000. Your attention is directed to FAR Clause 52.219-14(e)(3) , LIMITATIONS ON SUBCONTRACTING, which states, �By submission of an offer and execution of a contract, the Offeror/Contractor agrees in performance of the contract in the case of a contract for General construction, it will not pay more than 85 percent of the amount paid by the Government for contract performance, excluding the cost of materials, to subcontractors that are not similarly situated entities. Any work that a similarly situated entity further subcontracts will count towards the prime contractor�s 85 percent subcontract amount that cannot be exceeded.� 1. : POINT OF CONTACT (POC) SSG Jarrett Gillium Contract Specialist Email: jarrett.m.gillium.mil@army.mil 2.: COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS: This procurement is a 100% small business set-aside. 3. SITE VISIT: The Government has scheduled a one-day site visit at BLDG 9436 at the McGregor Range NM Complex Installation 10:00 am MDT on 20 August 2026. a. We will meet at the: The parking lot of BLDG 9436 Work is located at Building 9436 b. Contractors who wish to attend the site visit shall provide the name(s), company name, position title, telephone number, email address and mailing address of all attendees via email to jarrett.m. gillium.mil@army.mil no later than 4:00 p.m. MDT on 18 August 2026. c. The site visit is limited to a maximum of two (2) attendees per company. Contractor representatives should be prepared to furnish identification if requested. d. Individual or group questions will not be answered during the site visit. Potential offerors may submit written questions in accordance with number 4 (below) of these instructions to offerors section. Note: Remarks and explanations made by the Government representatives during the course of the site visit, whether orally or in writing, shall not change or qualify any of the terms or conditions of this solicitation. The solicitation can only be changed by a formal, written amendment issued by the Contracting Officer (KO). 4. REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI): All offeror inquiries or questions shall be submitted in Writing electronically at jarrett.m.gillium.mil@army.mil no later than 21 August 2026 by 4:00 p. m. MDT. An amendment will then be issued with all questions and answers. **After the due date no additional RFI's will be answered** 5. PROPOSAL DUE DATE: RFQs are due no later than 4:00 PM MDT on 26 August 2026. Proposals shall be emailed to jarrett.m.gillium.mil@army.mil. Proposals SHALL include the following in order to be considered (failure to include all line items shall be subject for rejection of the offer): a. Cover sheet on company letterhead with your DUNS number, CAGE code, Tax ID, and primary point of contact information; b. Signed and completed Standard Form 1442 along with any amendments; c. Letter from bonding company indicating offeror's ability to obtain payment bonds in the amount of their offer; d. Past Performance per Evaluation Factors. Please note that all correspondence via e-mail shall contain a subject line that reads, Remove and Replace Dishwasher DFAC at BLDG 9436, Company Name". If sending attachments via e-mail, ensure only .pdf, . doc or .xls documents are sent. In the body of the email please ensure to list the number of attachments submitted. It is the Contractor's responsibility to verify all emails along with all attachments are received by the Contract Specialist listed above. 6. BONDNG REQUIREMENTS: a. Payment Bonds: (1) The penal amount of the bonds shall be 100 percent of the awarded price. (2) The Government may require additional bond protection when a contract price is increased. The increase in protection shall generally equal 100 percent of the increase in contract price. The Government may secure additional protection by directing the contractor to increase the penal amount of the existing bond or obtain an additional bond. b. Offer Guarantee: (1) An Offer Guarantee is required. 7. SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM) ; Offeror must be registered in the database SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT (SAM): IAW FAR 52.204-7 in order to be awarded a contract and have the applicable NAICS code listed in FAR 52.219-1(c), Small Business Program Representations (Alternate I), Representations. EVALUATION FACTORS EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation using the evaluation method "Lowest Price Technically Acceptable." This method is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable offer with the lowest evaluated reasonable price. Offers will be evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-price factors. Evaluation factors and significant sub factors that establish the requirements of acceptability are set forth below. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated reasonable price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors (RFO FAR 15.103-2). The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in RFO FAR 15.202(a)(2)). Therefore, the offeror's initial proposal should contain the offeror's best terms from price, technical and past performance. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. The Government reserves the right to waive informalities and minor irregularities in offers received. If a minor clerical error has occurred, then the offeror may be given an opportunity to correct the minor error within the constraints of the "clarifications" process. This solicitation is for a firm, fixed price construction contract. Award shall be made to the technically acceptable offer that provides the lowest reasonable price. The Government intends to award a contract to one offeror deemed responsible in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 9.1). Offerors are required to submit technical proposals addressing the Evaluation Factors and Sub-Factors identified. The procurement is being conducted utilizing the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection process in accordance with RFO FAR 15.103-2. Proposal will be evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked, using the non-price evaluation factors. Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated reasonable price of proposals meeting the acceptability standards for non-price factors. There shall be no trade-offs. Offers evaluated as not Technically Acceptable will not be eligible for award, regardless of price. The proposal must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by the solicitation. The Government will rely on such information for the award of the contract. By submission of the offer, the Offeror agrees that all items proposed will be utilized for the duration of the contract and any substitutions will require prior Contracting Officer's approval. The offeror shall be held responsible for the validity of all information supplied in the proposal, including the information provided by potential subcontractors. Should subsequent investigation disclose that the facts and conditions were not as stated, the proposal may be rejected. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I -Technical Proposal - Part II - Past Performance -Part III- Price Proposal. The Government's technical evaluation team will evaluate the technical proposals on an acceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as "Unacceptable" will render the entire proposal unacceptable and, therefore, un-awardable. Only those proposals determined to be technically acceptable, at time of award, will be considered for award. However, the offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown. Unacceptable Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. TECHNICAL RATINGS Factor 1 Price: Price will be evaluated for completeness, reasonableness, and realism. Evaluations may include comparison with the Independent Government Estimate (IGE), historical pricing, and market research. The Government intends to make an award to the responsible Offeror whose proposal meets all technical requirements and offers the lowest evaluated price. Factor 2 Technical Acceptability: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's proposed technical approach on an Acceptable / Unacceptable basis in accordance with DoD Source Selection Procedures. To receive an "Acceptable" rating, the proposal must clearly demonstrate that the dishwasher system meets or exceeds all performance, energy-efficiency, and integration requirements specified in the Statement of Work. Technical acceptability includes demonstrating: Compatibility with existing facility conditions, electrical requirements, and tray configurations. Meeting or exceeding the performance requirements of the existing units (e.g., models STERO STPCW-ER-18, Hobart WPS-122, Hobart CLPS86E). Inclusion of manufacturer specifications, shop drawings, and technical data to allow review by the Government. Ability to source comparable current models via equipment manufacturers or kitchen equipment vendors. Factor 3 Experience in Commercial Kitchen/Restaurant-Type Projects: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's Experience on an Acceptable / Unacceptable basis. This factor ensures the Government receives a qualified contractor capable of handling specialized commercial kitchen equipment installations. To receive an "Acceptable" rating, the Offeror must demonstrate a minimum of five (5) years of experience performing commercial kitchen or restaurant-type projects similar in size, scope, and complexity to large-scale DFAC dishwasher or tray conveyor replacements. Evaluation will consider: Number of years of relevant experience (must meet the 5-year minimum). Examples of past projects involving the installation or replacement of commercial kitchen dishwashing systems. Documented successful completion of projects requiring coordination with food service operations, custom fabrication, and shop drawing review. Evaluation factors: Technical is more significant than both Past Performance and Price. Past Performance is significantly more important than Price but not more than Technical. Price is less significant than the factors of Technical and Past Performance. Each proposal shall be evaluated to ensure that all information provided in the RFQ has been addressed, is accurate and complete.