Skip to content
BidBenchmark

Contract award

NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION

200312!006055!2100!BL01 !ACA, ITEC4 !DAAB1501A1012 !A!N! !Y!0006 !20030910!20031209!614227643!004179453!016435559!N!NORTHROP GRUMMAN SPACE & MISSI!1800 GLENN CURTISS DRIVE !CARSON !CA!90746!11530!037!06!CARSON !LOS ANGELES !CALIFORNIA!+000006402796!N!N!000000000000!U012!ADP SOFTWARE, EQUIPMENT, AND TELE TRAINING !S1 !SERVICES !1000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !541512!E! !7! ! ! ! ! !99990909!C!A!Y!N!Z!A!N!J!2!004! ! !Z!N!Z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !B!B!A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
PIID
0006
Award key
CONT_AWD_0006_9700_DAAB1501A1012_9700
Recipient UEI
KD8LDKMJQF68
Parent award
9700
Source as of
Sep 24, 2026
Current award value
$03
Obligated to date
$142,630,2582
Potential with options
$03
Awarding agency
Department of DefenseDepartment of the Army
Place of performance
Carson, California
Set-aside
No set-aside used
Pricing
Firm Fixed Price
Competition
Full and Open Competition4 offers received
Period of performance
Sep 9, 2014 — Mar 28, 2008Through Mar 28, 2008 if all options are exercised
This award's category was assigned below the confidence threshold, so it is excluded from every published statistic. NAICS 541512

Against comparable awards

Where this award sits in the published IT Systems Design and Integration distribution.

At $0, this award is below the bottom quartile. The median is $3,293,737 across 57 comparable awards.

Comparison uses the same measure (current award value) and the snapshot published Oct 22, 2026. See the full benchmark.

Transaction history

Every action recorded against this award, in the order the government reported them.

ModAction dateReasonObligationValue at action
0Sep 10, 2003Initial award$6,402,796.00$0.00
2Feb 27, 2004Initial award$23,407,316.00—
5Nov 5, 2004C$12,852,266.00—
6Dec 1, 2004C$7,339,257.00—
7Mar 24, 2005C$8,000,000.00—
8May 20, 2005C$21,430,362.00—
10Jul 12, 2005C$3,379.00—
12Oct 28, 2005C$9,985,957.00—
13Jan 31, 2006C$11,981,089.00—
16May 26, 2006C$1,151,836.00—
17Jul 6, 2006C$17,000,000.00—
18Aug 8, 2006M$0.00—
19Aug 10, 2006C$1,456,000.00—
20Oct 16, 2006M$0.00—
21Jan 11, 2007C$10,000,000.00—
22Feb 8, 2007C$4,000,000.00—
23Feb 15, 2007M$0.00—
24Mar 7, 2007C$4,120,000.00—
25Jun 25, 2007M$0.00—
26Aug 15, 2007M$0.00—
27Nov 14, 2007M$0.00—
28Dec 6, 2007C$3,500,000.00—
29Jun 23, 2008M$0.00—
30Jun 2, 2009M$0.00—
31Sep 9, 2014M$0.00$0.00

Provenance

Which source record produced each displayed rollup figure.

FieldSourceFileRetrievedParserArtifact hash
awarding_agency_idUSAspending.govFY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csvOct 4, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2038972f3aaf0
contractor_idUSAspending.govFY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csvOct 4, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2038972f3aaf0
current_award_valueUSAspending.govFY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csvOct 4, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2038972f3aaf0
naics_codeUSAspending.govFY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csvOct 4, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2038972f3aaf0
potential_award_valueUSAspending.govFY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csvOct 4, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2038972f3aaf0
psc_codeUSAspending.govFY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csvOct 4, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2038972f3aaf0
total_obligatedUSAspending.govFY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csvOct 4, 2026usaspending_contract_csv@2026.08.2038972f3aaf0

Sources and method

Figures on this page are computed from public federal award records. Numbers are never estimated or generated; where a figure is withheld, the reason is stated rather than filled in.

This page is a record of one federal award, assembled from the transactions the government published against it. Note 1 describes where the rollup came from. Values are award values, not unit prices.

  1. 1Rollup values derive from 25 transaction records parsed from USAspending.gov (FY(All)_All_Contracts_Delta_20260924_1.csv), retrieved Oct 4, 2026 by transform awards@2026.08.1.
  2. 2Obligations are the sum of signed federal action obligations across all transactions; deobligations are negative and remain negative.
  3. 3Current and potential award values are taken from the latest reported action, not summed across modifications.
  4. 4Category was assigned with confidence 0.880 (rule), which is below the threshold for inclusion in published statistics. It is shown here for context only.